{"id":21803,"date":"2026-07-09T14:23:08","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T10:23:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/?p=21803"},"modified":"2026-07-09T15:25:25","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T11:25:25","slug":"why-our-brain-remembers-hostility-better-than-friendship-a-new-discovery-by-neurobiologists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/why-our-brain-remembers-hostility-better-than-friendship-a-new-discovery-by-neurobiologists\/","title":{"rendered":"Why our brain remembers hostility better than friendship: A new discovery by neurobiologists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-path-to-node=\"3\">Japanese scientists from Osaka University have conducted an intriguing neurobiological experiment to determine how our minds construct an internal map of social connections, alliances, and conflicts between people. Published in the journal <i data-path-to-node=\"3\" data-index-in-node=\"240\">Communications Psychology<\/i>, the study reveals that when we observe human interactions, the brain prioritizes and much more clearly highlights conflicts and antagonism than it does friendship.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"4\">Previous studies have largely examined social networks through dry, technical data\u2014such as how many acquaintances a person has or their position within a group. However, real-world relationships are not limited to a simple &#8220;connected\/unconnected&#8221; binary. Every connection is always accompanied by a powerful emotional context, such as trust, competition, sympathy, or hostility.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"5\">To study this emotional mapping, the researchers had students watch six episodes of the popular American drama <i data-path-to-node=\"5\" data-index-in-node=\"111\">Suits<\/i>. The participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) twice\u2014before and after watching the series\u2014while viewing photographs of the main characters. After the screening, the students evaluated all character pairs based on the nature of their relationships (whether friendly or hostile).<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"6\">The study&#8217;s results demonstrated that our brains perceive hostile relationships and conflicts most acutely and distinctly. When participants looked at the faces of characters who were antagonistic toward each other, specific brain regions\u2014the left anterior supramarginal gyrus and the right medial prefrontal cortex\u2014showed heightened activation. Interestingly, friendly connections did not elicit a similarly prominent or strong reaction in these parts of the brain.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"7\">According to Professor Tamami Nakano, when we observe people in a new social environment (whether in real life, a new workplace collective, or a fiction film), our minds subconsciously note first and foremost who is in conflict with whom. Conflicts and rivalries become a sort of anchor point for our brains because, evolutionarily, the rapid recognition of threatening and hostile relationships was far more critical for survival than identifying friendly alliances. Thanks to this instinct, the brain much more easily organizes and remembers the entire complex social network between individuals.<\/p>\n<p data-path-to-node=\"7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s44271-026-00491-y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nature<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Japanese scientists from Osaka University have conducted an intriguing neurobiological experiment to determine how our minds construct an internal map of social connections, alliances, and conflicts between people. Published in the journal Communications Psychology, the study reveals that when we observe human interactions, the brain prioritizes and much more clearly highlights conflicts and antagonism than [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":21802,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1631,1594,1587,1657],"tags":[2190,6230],"class_list":["post-21803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-neurology","category-news","category-research","category-science","tag-brain","tag-friendship"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21803"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21808,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21803\/revisions\/21808"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21802"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medscriptum.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}