A recent study by scientists from Pennsylvania State University and the University of Toronto, published in the journal Communications Psychology, has revealed a paradoxical link between artificial intelligence and human empathy.
The research demonstrated that although people rate AI responses as more empathetic, they still prefer receiving emotional support from another human being when given the choice.
As part of the study, researchers conducted four different experiments involving over 600 respondents. Participants were asked to share real-life emotional experiences and then choose whether they wanted to receive support from a human or from ChatGPT.
The study highlighted several key trends that explain the complex relationship between human preferences and the effectiveness of AI:
-
The Authenticity Factor: While the majority of respondents still choose humans for emotional support—underscoring the critical importance of “authenticity” and the human element—a paradoxical picture emerged during qualitative assessment.
-
Perceived Empathy: Even participants who preferred humans characterized AI-generated responses as having higher levels of empathy and care.
-
The Feeling of Being Heard: In terms of emotional impact, feedback from AI gave users a stronger sense of being listened to and understood compared to communication with a human.
These findings mirror an earlier study published in JAMA Internal Medicine. In that instance, doctors who were unaware of the authors’ identities rated medical consultations prepared by AI as higher in quality and more empathetic than the notes written by their fellow medical professionals.
Scientists suggest that the advantage of AI lies in its training. Artificial intelligence is trained on billions of texts and can perfectly balance the tone of conversation, whereas real people are often hindered by emotional and communicative barriers in such moments.
However, researchers emphasize that AI agents cannot replace professional psychologists or mental health specialists; instead, they can serve as a valuable “auxiliary tool.
